I am reading Infinite Jest and only Infinite Jest. Well, at least until I need a break. And that will happen. But it will pull at me and call to me even when it repulses me.
David
Foster Wallace is apparently my drug of choice. He makes me think too
much. His writing is a frustrating fixation, the intake of which I
promise myself I can control (denial? Is it a river?). I love his
Vulcan-like intellect, but it wears me out and impacts my sleep. I love
everything about his style, but it can be infuriating at times and
makes me see too much behind my eyelids. I find truths of human
psychology and gallows humor scattered in a field of tar and sap.
Dave brought up an analogy of DFW as my "crazy bitch" and I can't shout that down. I just read Of Human Bondage,
by W. Summerset Maugham, which featured a classic terrible girlfriend
in American literature. And, as Dave so well explained, I may have
found my "Mildred."
Before I subject the internet to a basic text conversation that led to the analogy, I offer a bit of background. I read The Pale King early in 2013 and loved it despite its trudging pace. (you can read that Here).
I started IJ shortly thereafter. It was good, but I had other book
obligations and decided that IJ requires a certain level of
concentration. So, I proceeded to devour other books, assigned books,
and my final book club book to clear the path for my one true fix.
I have enjoyed my other books, but my peripheral has never lost sight of Infinite Jest.
And, for me, it isn't just about DFW the writer (OK, it is, but not
quite 100%), but the subject matter itself as well. I have written
before that the farcical view is often therapeutic and there are parts
of my day-to-day life that require a certain level of gallows humor for
survival. I'll just say I often see the worst of many parts of life, and
a systematically farcical look at a serious world is extremely
appealing to me as an intellectual journey and exercise.
Last week, I finally zeroed in on IJ exclusively.

